Expert knowledge for digital decisions
Are there penalties for delayed deadlines?
Short answer
Without an Agreement, There Is No Penalty
A penalty requires that the contractor has promised it (§ 339 BGB). If there is nothing in the contract, in the event of a deadline overrunning, only the delay damage remains – and that must be quantified and substantiated. This is particularly difficult with software: Anyone wanting to prove what a six-week delay in the productive start has cost needs figures that are rarely available.
The sober purpose of a penalty is therefore not punishment, but facilitation of proof: It replaces the damage proof with a previously determined amount.
What Applies If Nothing Is Agreed
| Question | Rule |
|---|---|
| When does delay occur? | With reminder after due date; without reminder, if the performance period is calendar-determined (§ 286 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BGB) |
| Delay interest between companies | Nine percentage points above the base interest rate (§ 288 Abs. 2 BGB) |
| Flat rate | 40 euros in case of delay with a payment claim (§ 288 Abs. 5 BGB) |
| Further damage | Only against proof (§ 280 Abs. 1 and 2 BGB) |
A "ca." date in the offer is usually not a binding date. Anyone wanting a fixed date must agree on it as such, with a date.
What Should Be Included in a Usable Clause
- Reference Size – Net order value or only the value of the delayed section. This is the biggest lever and is most often overlooked.
- Rate and Rhythm – for example, per started calendar week.
- Upper Limit – without a cap, the clause is not calculable for either party.
- Fault and Cooperation – Delays arising from missing approvals, test data, or interface access from the client may postpone the deadline.
The Trap at Acceptance
§ 341 Abs. 3 BGB: If the client accepts the service, they can only demand the penalty if they reserve the right at the time of acceptance. This reservation must literally be included in the acceptance protocol. In practice, it is regularly forgotten – and thus the penalty is lost, even though the delay was undisputed.
Limits of Amount
In general terms and conditions, a penalty is subject to content control under § 307 BGB. The Federal Court of Justice has ruled for construction contracts that a standard penalty of more than five percent of the order sum unfairly disadvantages the contractor. This limit cannot be transferred uncritically to software contracts but serves as a guideline.
An disproportionately high penalty can be reduced by the court upon request (§ 343 BGB). This does not apply to merchants: Anyone promising the penalty in the course of their commercial business cannot have it reduced according to § 348 HGB. GmbHs are commercial entities – thus the clause applies here in full force.
What a Penalty Costs, Even If It Never Becomes Due
It is not free. A provider who accepts it calculates a risk surcharge and plans deadlines more defensively. The result is higher prices and longer promised durations – with the same actual effort.
A penalty makes sense where a hard external deadline exists: a trade fair, a system shutdown date, a legal deadline such as the obligation to send e-invoices from January 1, 2027. For exploratory projects, whose scope clarifies during work, it is the wrong tool: It shifts the energy from the matter to the question of who is responsible for the delay.
At Ouhud GmbH
available upon request
This text does not replace legal advice.
Key facts
- Legal Basis
- A penalty arises only from an explicit penalty promise (§ 339 BGB), never by operation of law.
- § 341 Abs. 3 BGB
- Without reservation at acceptance, the claim for the penalty is forfeited.
- Legal Basis
- Delay interest between companies amounts to nine percentage points above the base interest rate (§ 288 Abs. 2 BGB), plus a flat rate of 40 euros (§ 288 Abs. 5 BGB).
- Merchants
- and thus every GmbH – cannot have a promised penalty reduced under § 343 BGB (§ 348 HGB).
- Legal Basis
- In GTC, the amount is subject to content control under § 307 BGB; construction contract jurisprudence sets the limit at five percent of the order sum.
Sources
All external claims are backed by traceable sources.-
01
§ 339 BGB – Verwirkung der Vertragsstrafe Bundesministerium der Justiz
-
02
§ 341 BGB – Strafversprechen für nicht gehörige Erfüllung Bundesministerium der Justiz
-
03
§ 343 BGB – Herabsetzung der Strafe Bundesministerium der Justiz
-
04
§ 348 HGB – Keine Herabsetzung bei Kaufleuten Bundesministerium der Justiz
-
05
§ 288 BGB – Verzugszinsen und sonstiger Verzugsschaden Bundesministerium der Justiz
-
06
§ 286 BGB – Verzug des Schuldners Bundesministerium der Justiz